Chapter 12 — Salthill

Neglect and emotional abuse

In 1947, the Visitor observed that: ‘Apart from Government grants ..., rent, shops and farm contributed substantially to the funds’. Notwithstanding this, in 1951, the Visitor referred to the serious disadvantage caused by the lack of a farm. There was insufficient land attached to the Institution to allow it to be self-sufficient in terms of food.

During the relevant period, funding for the boys in Salthill was adequate to meet their basic needs.

The early Visitation Reports from the 1940s were very critical of the lack of hygiene in the School.

In 1938, the Visitor’s Report painted a rather dismal picture of life in the Institution. The Visitor noted that the workshops were very old and dilapidated. He advised that they be replaced immediately, as they presented a potential hazard.

He suggested that the chapel be heated during the months of rain, not only to preserve the timber but also as the children must be cold. Similarly, he noted that the recreation hall presented as drab, dark and cold, although ‘a few expressed the view that the breaths of the large number of boys made the room quite endurable’. He recommended that a good heating system would be desirable for maintenance purposes. An indication of how cold the School must have been was gleaned from the fact that the Brothers tended to wear their cloaks at all times up to the month of April. The boys did not possess cloaks.

The Visitor was critical of the overall cleanliness of the boys’ clothing and of the dormitories.

In 1939, Dr Anna McCabe30 conducted her first general inspection of Salthill. She noted that the School looked untidy, as did the children. Otherwise, she found the boys were healthy.

The following year, the Visitor remarked that, ‘this is the one of our institutions that has impressed me least’. The Institution gave a dirty, drab impression and ‘tidiness is not a feature of the place’.

The boys’ kitchen was renovated in 1942, as it was in a particularly offensive condition because of rats’ nests, a fact that was not commented on by the Department of Education Inspector.

Dr McCabe wrote to the Resident Manager, after her inspection in July 1942, complaining about: the unsatisfactory conditions in which I found the beds and bedding, dormitories and corridors, in the matter of general cleanliness, also the need for painting and plastering of some of the walls.

Br Vachel,31 the Manager, defended the condition of the Institution, and blamed Dr McCabe’s poor impression on the bad timing of her visit.

The Visitor in May 1943 was shocked at the state of disrepair and low standard of cleanliness of the premises, which he put down to wartime conditions, low finances, and a certain lack of energy on the part of the Superior due to his ill-health. The Report noted a lack of cleanliness in the boys’ bedclothes, but reserved its main criticism for their eating facilities and implements: The boys’ refectory is the part of the institution most lacking in cleanliness. The floor is in a bad condition. The oil cloth covering the tables is old dirty and in places ragged. The forms are dirty and badly need scrubbing. The plates and mugs are of aluminium and have the undersides dirty and greasy. Some of the mugs are of tin showing signs of rust. The plates that were once enamelled have a wretched appearance. The Brother in charge has too little to do but he is dirty and lazy ... The impression produced is that St. Joseph’s is a neglected place inhabited by people devoid of a sense of cleanliness. Some cleanup may have been done in preparation for the visitor and the ordinary condition may be worse that what I describe so that if a Government Inspector came unannounced and made a close inspection his report would be very damaging and would bring shame upon us.

The Visitor was of the view that the situation in Salthill was so serious that a visit from the Brother Provincial would be necessary in order to drive home the gravity of the matter to the Superior.

A similar theme pervaded the Visitation Reports of the 1940s, and the shocking state of the Institution was referred to again and again.

The 1944 Visitation Report noted the shabby state of the boys’ refectory and dilapidated condition of the outbuildings.