Explore the Ryan Report

Chapter 14 — Children’s Homes

Back
Show Contents

Current circumstances

164

Fourteen (14) witnesses, 10 male and four female, reported having generally good parent–child relationships despite encountering some periods of difficulty with one or other of their children. A number of witnesses commented that difficulties arose when their child was the same age as they were at the time they were abused. Many witnesses commented on the support and positive contribution of spouses who assisted them in their parental role and were understanding of the difficulties they encountered.

165

Seven (7) witnesses reported that their children had significant behavioural and emotional difficulties that required episodes of residential and day treatment in mental health and addiction counselling services. Four (4) witnesses reported the loss of children in tragic circumstances, including suicide and accidents.

166

Six (6) witnesses reported that the regimented and abusive environments they experienced in Children’s Homes contributed at times to harsh relationships with their own children. Five (5) other witnesses described having been physically abusive to their children. A small number of witnesses reported that contact with their adult children had been lost following episodes of abuse or neglect in their childhoods.

167

It was frequently remarked by witnesses that the difficulties they experienced as parents and the inability to show love and affection to their own children were overcome in their role as grandparents. Many witnesses reported having mutually rewarding and enjoyable relationships with their grandchildren.

168

The practice of separating boys and girls when they were admitted to out-of-home care in the pre-1970s was reported by witnesses to have contributed to the fragmentation of their families. The painful impact of being separated from siblings was experienced both during the witnesses’ time in the institutions and following discharge. Thirty (30) witnesses, 17 male and 13 female, reported feeling disconnected, having little contact with their siblings and other family members since their discharge from the Homes. A number of these witnesses reported feeling rejected by and alienated from their family members, which they believed was the result of separation and lack of contact in their childhood.

169

Twenty one (21) witnesses, 14 male and seven female, reported that contact with family members was frequently characterised by ambivalence and conflict. Many witnesses described having ongoing and close contact with a number of their siblings and almost no communication with others. Seventeen (17) witnesses gave accounts of receiving help and support from extended family members following their discharge, including grandmothers, aunts and uncles, in the absence of such assistance being available from parents and siblings.

170

Ten (10) witnesses had no contact with any family members, including four male and two female witnesses who had no information about their families in spite of their attempts to trace relatives.

171

The majority of witnesses reported a history of full employment since their discharge from the Children’s Homes. Twenty (20) witnesses, 15 male and five female, reported being employed for 30 years or more. A further 13 witnesses, five male and eight female, were employed for 10 years or more. Thirty one (31) witnesses, 17 male and 14 female, reported being in full-time employment at the time of their hearings. Table 78 illustrates the employment status of witnesses reported at their hearing:
Employment status Male Female

Total witnesses
Employed 8 12 20
Retired 11 2 13
Disability income 2 1 3
Unemployed 8 2 10
Self-employed 6 2 8
Defence Forces 3 0 3
Working at home 0 4 4
Total 38 23 61

172

The following table provides a breakdown of the witnesses’ reports of their current occupational status at the time of their hearing:
Occupational status Males Females Total Witnesses
Professional 0 1 1
Manual and technical 4 2 6
Non-manual 3 5 8
Skilled manual 11 2 13
Semi-skilled 8 3 11
Unskilled 12 8 20
Unavailable 0 2 2
Total 38 23 61

173

Twenty (20) witnesses reported being employed in unskilled positions. Most had spent many years of their childhoods in residential facilities and reported that they were ill-equipped for any employment other than domestic positions or unskilled work. A number of these witnesses found employment in institutional settings as cleaners, waiters and porters and in the Defence Forces.

174

A number of witnesses commented that their lack of education while in the Children’s Homes contributed to subsequent difficulties with employment. The table below illustrates the highest education level attended, but not in all instances completed, by both male and female witnesses:
Highest level of education Males Females Total witnesses
Primary 16 9 25
Secondary 14 9 23
Third level 8 4 12
No education 0 1 1
Total 38 23 61

175

The 12 witnesses who attended third-level education reported doing so as adults and a number reported having had years of successful employment, including careers in nursing, retailing, and management. One female witness reported that she never attended school.

176

Other witnesses described having difficulties with authority, which led to frequent changes of employment and periods of unemployment. A small number of these witnesses later established themselves in successful, long-term self-employed careers.

177

Forty seven (47) witnesses reported having stable housing arrangements at the time of their hearing, as shown in the following table:
Accommodation Males Females Total witnesses
Owner occupiers 23 12 35
Local authority/ council housing 5 7 12
Private rented accommodation 4 2 6
With relatives 1 1 2
Sheltered housing 0 1 1
With friends 1 0 1
Hostel 1 0 1
Unavailable 3 0 3
Total 38 23 61

178

A number of witnesses described earlier periods of unstable housing with frequent changes of address. Many had lived in temporary accommodation during the initial years following their discharge. Ten (10) witnesses, eight male and two female, reported having been homeless and living in transient accommodation facilities at some time in the past.


Footnotes
  1. Officers – Children’s officers were employed by local health authorities prior to 1970 and were increasingly replaced by social workers thereafter.
  2. Children Act, 1908 section 64.
  3. Foster care – previously known in Ireland as ‘boarding out’, also referred to as ‘at nurse’, is a form of out-of-home care that allows for a child to be placed in a family environment rather than an institution.
  4. Special needs services – includes day and residential schools and facilities designated to meet the educational needs of children with intellectual, physical or sensory impairments. Such services were generally managed by religious congregations and were both publicly and privately funded.
  5. The categorisation is based on Census 2002, Volume 6 Occupations, Appendix 2, Definitions – Labour Force. In two-parent households the father’s occupation was recorded and in other instances the occupational status of the sole parent was recorded, in so far as it was known.
  6. Formal child care training was first established in Ireland in the 1970s.
  7. Primary Certificate – examination certificate awarded at the end of primary school education, it was abolished in 1967.
  8. Note – a number of witnesses were admitted to more than one Children’s Home, and made reports of abuse in more than one Children’s Home, therefore, the number of reports are greater than the number of witnesses.
  9. Section 1(1)(a)
  10. Section 1(1)(b)
  11. Section (1)(1)(c) as amended by section 3 of the 2005 Act
  12. Section 1(1)(d) as amended by section 3 of the 2005 Act