- Volume 1
- Volume 2
-
Volume 3
- Introduction
- Methodology
- Social and demographic profile of witnesses
- Circumstances of admission
- Family contact
- Everyday life experiences (male witnesses)
- Record of abuse (male witnesses)
- Everyday life experiences (female witnesses)
- Record of abuse (female witnesses)
- Positive memories and experiences
- Current circumstances
- Introduction to Part 2
- Special needs schools and residential services
- Children’s Homes
- Foster care
- Hospitals
- Primary and second-level schools
- Residential Laundries, Novitiates, Hostels and other settings
- Concluding comments
- Volume 4
Chapter 3 — Social and demographic profile of witnesses
BackSiblings
Six hundred and eighty four (684) of the 791 witnesses (86%) reported that they had brothers and/or sisters, some or all of whom may also have been in out-of-home care. A further 38 witnesses reported not knowing whether or not they had any siblings. For the purpose of this Report, half-brothers and sisters are included as siblings when the witness reported having lived with them as family members. The following table indicates approximate family size reported by witnesses:
Number of siblings | Number of witnesses |
---|---|
0 | 69 |
1 – 5 | 405 |
6 – 10 | 209 |
11 – 15 | 64 |
16+ | 6 |
Unknown | 38 |
Total | 791 |
Two hundred and seventy nine (279) witnesses (35%) reported having six or more brothers and sisters with 70 of those witnesses being from families of 12 children or more. The average family size reported by the 684 witnesses was 6 children. The other 107 witnesses were deemed to be single children without siblings, having either stated that they knew they had no siblings or that they have never been able to establish the facts in relation to their family of origin details. Allowing for families represented by more than one witness to the Committee, the 791 witnesses represent 663 families. There were an estimated 4,139 children in those families.
Residences prior to admission
The majority of witnesses reported a relatively settled history in relation to where they resided prior to their admission to a School, as shown in the following table:
Number of prior residences | Males | % | Females | % | Total witnesses |
% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
One | 312 | 76 | 261 | 69 | 573 | 72 |
Two | 47 | 11 | 55 | 15 | 102 | 13 |
Three | 8 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 | 2 |
Four | 2 | (0) | 0 | 0 | 2 | (0) |
Five | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | (0) |
Unavailable | 44 | 11 | 53 | 14 | 97 | 12 |
Total | 413 | 100 | 378 | (100)* | 791 | (100)* |
Five hundred and seventy three (573) witnesses (72%) reported that admission to a School was their first change of residence. Approximately half of these witnesses reported being admitted to a School from their family home in the context of some crisis and consequent intervention. A further 102 witnesses (13%) reported having two changes of residence before they were admitted to the School system, many of which were placements in Children’s Homes from mother and baby homes or foster care prior to being transferred to an Industrial School. The 97 witnesses reported as unknown in this category are a combination of witnesses who did not have any information about their early circumstances or who did not provide information about their residence prior to admission. As may be observed, male witnesses reported somewhat more stability in their place of residence prior to admission to the School system, with 7% more male witnesses reporting only one prior residence.
Place of birth
Witnesses who gave evidence to the Committee reported that they were born in 25 of the 26 counties in the Republic of Ireland and in two of the Northern Ireland counties, in addition to England, Scotland and Wales. See the following table for details:
County – place of birth | Males | Females | Total witnesses |
---|---|---|---|
Carlow | 4 | 5 | 9 |
Cavan | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Clare | 7 | 16 | 23 |
Cork | 64 | 37 | 101 |
Donegal | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Dublin | 188 | 140 | 328 |
Galway | 13 | 20 | 33 |
Kerry | 6 | 12 | 18 |
Kildare | 3 | 8 | 11 |
Kilkenny | 6 | 5 | 11 |
Laois | 5 | 8 | 13 |
Limerick | 33 | 22 | 55 |
Longford | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Louth | 5 | 13 | 18 |
Mayo | 5 | 3 | 8 |
Meath | 3 | 1 | 4 |
Monaghan | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Offaly | 5 | 9 | 14 |
Roscommon | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Sligo | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Tipperary | 16 | 15 | 31 |
Waterford | 10 | 11 | 21 |
Westmeath | 5 | 7 | 12 |
Wexford | 6 | 8 | 14 |
Wicklow | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Northern Ireland: Derry | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Northern Ireland: Tyrone | 0 | 1 | 1 |
England/Scotland/Wales | 14 | 18 | 32 |
Unknown | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Total | 413 | 378 | 791 |
Dublin, Cork, Limerick, Galway and Tipperary were the birth counties of 314 male witnesses (76%) and 234 female witnesses (62%).
A small number of witnesses were of Irish Traveller or mixed-race backgrounds and to maintain anonymity no further information can be provided.
Current country of residence
As previously stated and show in the following table, many witnesses who gave evidence to the Committee were residing outside Ireland at the time of their hearing:
Country of residence | Males | % | Females | % | Total witnesses | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ireland | 279 | 68 | 182 | 48 | 461 | 58 |
UK | 118 | 29 | 172 | 46 | 290 | 37 |
USA/Canada | 8 | 2 | 13 | 3 | 21 | 3 |
Australia/New Zealand | 5 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 12 | 2 |
Mainland Europe | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 1 |
Total | 413 | (100)* | 378 | 100 | 791 | (100)* |
As indicated, there was a significant difference between the numbers of male and female witnesses living in Ireland and in the UK. Sixty eight percent (68%) of male witnesses were living in Ireland at the time of their hearing compared with 48% of female witnesses. Most of the witnesses living in the UK reported being there since they were discharged from the Schools or shortly thereafter. Many commented on the considerable help and assistance they received, both at a personal and professional level, from health and welfare services in the UK.
Age at time of hearing
At the time of their hearings 656 of the 791 witnesses (83%) were over 49 years of age, with 57 of those witnesses aged over 70 years. See Table 10 for more complete details:
Age range | Males | % | Females | % | Total witnesses | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 – 39 years | 12 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 18 | 2 |
40 – 49 years | 54 | 13 | 63 | 17 | 117 | 15 |
50 – 59 years | 186 | 45 | 193 | 51 | 379 | 48 |
60 – 69 years | 119 | 29 | 101 | 27 | 220 | 28 |
70 + years | 42 | 10 | 15 | 4 | 57 | 7 |
Total | 413 | 100 | 378 | (100)* | 791 | 100 |
As the table demonstrates, 76% of the total number of witnesses who gave evidence in relation to Schools were aged between 50 and 70 years at the time of the hearing. There were some differences between the ages of the male and female witnesses, with 74% of male witnesses aged between 50 and 70 compared with 78% of female witnesses. In addition, 6% more male witnesses were aged over 70 years.
Chapter 4 provides information on the reported circumstances that led to these witnesses being placed in out-of-home care as children.
Footnotes
- See chapters 12-18.
- Of note is the fact that witness reports from ‘Other Institutions’ referred to discharges up to the year 2000.
- This percentage is based on a total of 791 witnesses who reported abuse in Industrial and Reformatory Schools.
- The categorisation is based on Census 2002, Volume 6 Occupations, Appendix 2, Definitions – Labour Force. In two-parent households the father’s occupation was recorded and in other instances the occupational status of the sole parent was recorded, insofar as it was known.