10,992 entries for Inspections - State
BackThe Rosminians rejected the use of the ‘break-even’ formula: the condition described as breaking even is a false approbation. The School simply postponed improvements in order to maintain existing services. Expenditure was dictated by necessity, and sometimes crisis rather than performance, or aspiration.57
1.There was no opportunity for a school with particular need to have a voice in the negotiations with the Department. The negotiations were dominated by the larger boys schools which adopted a ‘one size fits all’ policy 2.Smaller schools without these advantages struggled to survive.
In a very real sense, poverty was the reason for the Industrial schools. The result of the adverse economic conditions of the times was that the late 1920s, 30s and 40s were scarred by deep poverty. All the classic signs were there: tuberculosis (‘consumption’); rickets; anaemia; emigration; apathy; money-lending and high unemployment, especially in the cities of Dublin, Cork, Waterford and Limerick.
An economic depression lasted virtually throughout the 1920s and 30s. The war years, 1939-45, were a period of further economic decline, with urban unemployment and a drop in real wages of 30 percent between 1939 and 1943 and a recovery to the 1939 figure only in 1949. Even then stagnation set in until 1958. Thereafter, the economy grew at an unprecedented rate through the 1960s (about 4 percent pa) and through the 70s in a more patchy way.
Another contributory factor to child poverty was the fact that during the period 1930-80, Irish levels of fertility were consistently the highest in Western Europe. Infant mortality, often invoked as a guide to living standards, was 90 per 1,000 in 1914. Then there was a reduction but it rose significantly during World War II (indeed during the period 1936-48 it remained between 60-80 per 1,000).1 In sum, it was inevitable that one of the major (if seldom noticed) problems of public policy would remain a significant number of poor families. At the root of this poverty was unemployment, coupled with the lack of welfare benefits. Usually the reason for low income was unemployment, which was heavily concentrated in Cork, Limerick, Waterford and especially Dublin. The following Table shows the unemployment rates.<br><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th><strong>Year</strong></th>
 <th><strong>Dublin County Borough</strong></th>
 <th><strong>National</strong></th>
 </tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Unemployed</strong><br></br><strong>Figures</strong></td>
 <td><strong>Rate as % of </strong><br></br><strong>those available</strong><br></br><strong>for work</strong></td>
 <td><strong>Unemployed</strong><br></br><strong>Figures</strong></td>
 <td><strong>Rate as % of </strong><br></br><strong>those available</strong><br></br><strong>for work</strong></td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>1926</strong></td>
 <td>13,580</td>
 <td>14.7</td>
 <td>66,393</td>
 <td>6.9</td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>1936</strong></td>
 <td>17,500</td>
 <td>13.2</td>
 <td>83,235</td>
 <td>8.5</td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>1946</strong></td>
 <td>13,141</td>
 <td>9.7</td>
 <td>51,809</td>
 <td>5.4</td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>1951</strong></td>
 <td>9,293</td>
 <td>6.2</td>
 <td>36,115</td>
 <td>3.8</td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>1956</strong></td>
 <td>9,861</td>
 <td>6.6</td>
 <td>55,157</td>
 <td>6.6</td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>1961</strong></td>
 <td>8,559</td>
 <td>6.1</td>
 <td>46,989</td>
 <td>5.7</td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>1966</strong></td>
 <td>7,514</td>
 <td>5.1</td>
 <td>43,864</td>
 <td>5.3</td>
 </tr></tbody></table>
This general view is confirmed by a number of empirical pioneering surveys in or about the 1940s by doctors or other public-spirited citizens. Writing in 1938 about the general population, Dr Fearon2 estimated that a weekly income of 30 shillings per week would be needed to keep a person, and of this amount the expenditure on food would be 10 shillings for a diet which ‘is almost’ nutritionally adequate. Yet 50 percent of the population had a weekly income of 20 shillings or less and spent 8 shillings or less on food.3 In the same year, the Rotunda Hospital, in inner North Dublin, almoners carried out a dietary survey on a small sample of 50 families living in one-roomed tenements where the breadwinner was unemployed – in other words the families whose children were most likely to be committed. The almoners found that when rent, insurance, fuel and light were paid, the average weekly sum available for food and clothes, for each family member, was 3 shillings.4
A few years later, in 1945, the cost of living had increased and another study of family income told the same sad story. This study of 10,500 families drawn at random from the Corporation’s information on families in Dublin, found that 55 percent of them had an income that was below £2.10 s 0d. The significance of the figure of £2.10 s is as follows. The unemployment assurance was relatively high but only lasted for a few months. Where a man was unemployed beyond this period, he and his family would go on to either home assistance or unemployment assistance. In 1945, in the case of Dublin residents, this was 30 shillings per week. In addition, children’s allowances would bring in another 7s 6d, food and (in winter) fuel vouchers would bring in another 6 shillings, and there might also be a grant from St Vincent de Paul or another charity. Yet experts at the time stated that the weekly minimum cost for a healthy standard of living ranged from £3.5s 0d. to £4.18 s 0d for a family with five children between the ages of five and 15 (taking the lowest figure for rent and for nutrition which will create healthy growth and resistance to the social disease of tuberculosis and rheumatism). Extrapolating from these figures, one can deduce that throughout the country, there was likely to have been at least 60,000 children who, because of either their parents’ chronic unemployment or inadequate wages, were living at such levels of destitution as to make them eligible for Industrial Schools.5
A 1948 survey contrasted two types of meals, the ‘bread and spread’ and the cooked meal. The ‘bread and spread’ consisted of a tea or milk drink, bread and a butter or jam spread. The cooked meal consisted of fish, meat, or eggs and may also have included potatoes and vegetables or a pudding. For children under 14 years of age in slum families, 44 percent of all the meals they ate were of the ‘bread and spread’ type, while these figures declined to 36 percent of children in artisan families, and 18 percent in middle class families. The survey found that intakes of milk and cheese were insufficient in all income groups, although the deficiencies were most marked in slum families.
As to housing for the poor, there was even at the higher level a shortage of adequate accommodation at affordable rents and, at the lowest level, an absence of any accommodation that was not overcrowded, unheated or often rat-infested.6 The conditions were ‘often quite unsuitable for cattle’.7 Writing about housing conditions especially in urban areas in the 1930s O’Cinneide and Maguire state:8 Studies ... especially in urban areas in the 1930s suggest that housing conditions improved little from the beginning of the Irish Free State. In fact, one report noted that the number of urban families living in unsuitable or hazardous conditions in the intervening years rose from 25,820, in 1913 to 28,200 in 1938, in spite of slum clearance efforts in the intervening years.
As late as 1950, there were 6,300 tenements housing 112,000 people or nearly one-third of Dublin Corporation population.9<br><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th></th>
 <th><strong>1926</strong><br></br></th>
 <th><strong>1936</strong></th>
 <th><strong>1946</strong></th>
 <th><strong>1961</strong></th>
 </tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td>
 <td><strong>No of households/ persons</strong></td>
 <td><strong>No of households/ persons</strong></td>
 <td><strong>No of households/ persons</strong></td>
 <td><strong>No of households/ persons</strong></td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>All areas</strong></td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>Private households in 1 room </strong></td>
 <td>47,000<br></br>
 140,000</td>
 <td>43,000<br></br>
 125,000</td>
 <td>34,000<br></br>
 89,000<br></br></td>
 <td>15,000<br></br>
 27,000<br></br></td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>- with 1 or 2 persons</strong></td>
 <td>24,000<br></br>
 35,000</td>
 <td>23,000<br></br>
 33,000</td>
 <td>20,000<br></br>
 28,000</td>
 <td>12,000<br></br>
 15,000</td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>- with 3–5 persons</strong></td>
 <td>17,000<br></br>
 85,000</td>
 <td>15,000<br></br>
 56,000</td>
 <td>11,000<br></br>
 43,000</td>
 <td>3,000<br></br>
 10,000</td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>- with 6+ persons</strong></td>
 <td>6,000<br></br>
 41,000</td>
 <td>5,000<br></br>
 36,000</td>
 <td>3,000<br></br>
 18,000</td>
 <td>321<br></br>
 2,000</td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>Dublin City and County</strong></td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>Private households in 1 room </strong></td>
 <td>27,000<br></br>
 89,000</td>
 <td>27,000<br></br>
 92,000</td>
 <td>22,000<br></br>
 66,000</td>
 <td>11,000<br></br>
 21,000</td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>- with 1 or 2 persons</strong></td>
 <td>12,000<br></br>
 18,000</td>
 <td>16,000<br></br>
 22,000</td>
 <td>14,000<br></br>
 19,000</td>
 <td> 9,000<br></br>
 12,000</td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>- with 3–5 persons</strong></td>
 <td>11,000<br></br>
 42,000</td>
 <td>11,000<br></br>
 42,000</td>
 <td>9,000<br></br>
 33,000</td>
 <td>2,000<br></br>
 8,000</td>
 </tr><tr><td><strong>- with 6+ persons</strong></td>
 <td>4,000<br></br>
 28,000</td>
 <td>4,000<br></br>
 28,000</td>
 <td>2,000<br></br>
 14,000</td>
 <td>258<br></br>
 2,000</td>
 </tr></tbody></table>
The Table shows that, for instance, in 1946, there were 3,000 households comprising six or more people living in one-room accommodation. Two-thirds of these one-room accommodation units were in Dublin City and County. These figures were worse in 1936 and worse again in 1926. By 1961, however, there had been significant improvement on the 1946 figures. Small wonder that the numbers of Dublin children committed for reasons of poverty were disproportionately high.
As the country became less poor through the late 1950s and 1960s conditions improved. In 1936, in Dublin inner city, a family would have to consist of nine or more persons in one room to merit Corporation housing. Even then, many families living 12 in one room had to refuse the offer of a corporation house because they could not afford the rent. With the advent in 1950 of the differential rents system for corporation houses, this difficulty fell away and, by 1961, while conditions were still not good, a family of three or four had a reasonable chance of rehousing.
Although conditions were worst in Dublin, they were also bad in the provinces. The following descriptions of family circumstances were collected by O’Cinneide and Maguire from ISPCC files:10 One-roomed house, mud-walled cabin, overcrowded and condemned by CMO. One bed for entire family (family of five, 1938, Arklow) Two-roomed house mud walls and thatched in very bad state of repair; no rent paid. Home congested and damp, unfit for human habitation (family of four, 1943, Wexford) Living in with the paternal grandfather in one room. Very little furniture. One double bed, poorly covered. One pram. Room clean and tidy. Family are overcrowded (family of six, 1954, Wicklow).
Income shortage was often compounded by bad management and debt was a major problem. Credit unions did not start until the late 1960s. Moneylenders charged up to 100 percent interest and took children’s allowance books as security. One poor mother described her whirligig of debt – to the landlord, ESB, shop on the corner, moneylenders – as being ‘as if my head and my feet are in a halter’.11 Alcoholism or gambling were other thorns. Parents were occasionally in such severe straits that they refused to take their child home from maternity hospital. Dr Dillon wrote in 1945:12 The Poor cannot keep clean, because they are unable to buy soap or fuel to heat water. With every month at unemployment their position becomes more desperate, more hopeless, until they finally join the ranks of the unemployable. The mother starves herself to feed her children and, in a very high percentage of cases, is found on examination to be suffering from nutritional anaemia. The children fall behind in school and gradually slip down to a social status even lower than their parents. They are in the majority of cases all but useless to the modern employer. At the age of 18 they are replaced by some other unfortunate and join the ranks of the unemployable proletariat. There are families in Dublin in which the second generation is now well advanced on that dreary road.
Family-planning facilities were virtually non-existent and many marriages floundered owing to these extreme family stresses. For instance: 13 A typical example of the emigration pattern of the 1940s and 1950s was an expectant mother with five children alive out of eight pregnancies, who usually became pregnant during her husband’s infrequent visits home. She lived in two rooms at the top of a city tenement, and was known to the almoner from 1939 to 1957. She was distraught because she suspected that her husband, who was living in ‘digs’ in England, was having an affair with his landlady – ‘he never wires but send money regularly’. She described him as ‘indifferent’, having no affection for his children.