186 entries for Finance
BackThe majority of boys who were committed to Glin through the courts came from impoverished and dysfunctional backgrounds. Some were committed for criminal offences. Court orders and School registers retained by the Christian Brothers show that, during the period 1940 to 1966, a total of 759 boys, of whom 131 were illegitimate, were committed to the School.
The number of children in Glin grew during the 1930s and 1940s, reaching a peak of 212 in 1949 and 1950. There was a steady decline in numbers during the 1950s and 1960s, and the School was closed in 1966, at which stage there were 48 boys in residence. The following table sets out the numbers of boys in the School:
Year | Number under detention |
---|---|
1937 | 172 |
1938 | 154 |
1939 | 158 |
1940 | 158 |
1941 | 187 |
1942 | 200 |
1943 | 208 |
1944 | 200 |
1945 | 206 |
1946 | 208 |
1947 | 211 |
1948 | 211 |
1949 | 212 |
1950 | 212 |
1951 | 203 |
1952 | 187 |
1953 | 182 |
1954 | 190 |
1955 | 160 |
1956 | 142 |
1957 | 133 |
1958 | 123 |
1959 | 120 |
1960 | 103 |
1961 | 91 |
1962 | 90 |
1963 | 82 |
1964 | 80 |
1965 | 68 |
1966 |
48 |
The number of children in Glin grew during the 1930s and 1940s, reaching a peak of 212 in 1949 and 1950. There was a steady decline in numbers during the 1950s and 1960s, and the School was closed in 1966, at which stage there were 48 boys in residence. The following table sets out the numbers of boys in the School:
Year | Number under detention |
---|---|
1937 | 172 |
1938 | 154 |
1939 | 158 |
1940 | 158 |
1941 | 187 |
1942 | 200 |
1943 | 208 |
1944 | 200 |
1945 | 206 |
1946 | 208 |
1947 | 211 |
1948 | 211 |
1949 | 212 |
1950 | 212 |
1951 | 203 |
1952 | 187 |
1953 | 182 |
1954 | 190 |
1955 | 160 |
1956 | 142 |
1957 | 133 |
1958 | 123 |
1959 | 120 |
1960 | 103 |
1961 | 91 |
1962 | 90 |
1963 | 82 |
1964 | 80 |
1965 | 68 |
1966 |
48 |
The average age of boys committed to Glin was nine years and 10 months, and the average stay of these boys was five years and eight months.
The average age of boys committed to Glin was nine years and 10 months, and the average stay of these boys was five years and eight months.
Mr Dunleavy BL, in his report on Glin Industrial School, examined the reasons for boys being admitted. During the period 1940 to 1947, he tabulated his findings as follows:
Reason for admission | Number |
---|---|
Destitution | 111 |
Larceny | 62 |
Not attending school | 61 |
Wandering | 49 |
Having a parent not a proper guardian | 38 |
Parents unable to control child | 12 |
Receiving alms | 10 |
Being under the care of a parent with criminal habits | 6 |
Homelessness | 5 |
Fraudulent conversion | 2 |
Housebreaking | 2 |
Assault | 2 |
Malicious damage | 2 |
Total |
362 |
Mr Dunleavy BL, in his report on Glin Industrial School, examined the reasons for boys being admitted. During the period 1940 to 1947, he tabulated his findings as follows:
Reason for admission | Number |
---|---|
Destitution | 111 |
Larceny | 62 |
Not attending school | 61 |
Wandering | 49 |
Having a parent not a proper guardian | 38 |
Parents unable to control child | 12 |
Receiving alms | 10 |
Being under the care of a parent with criminal habits | 6 |
Homelessness | 5 |
Fraudulent conversion | 2 |
Housebreaking | 2 |
Assault | 2 |
Malicious damage | 2 |
Total |
362 |
His examination of the data revealed that, apart from one 12-year-old boy who was sentenced for a period of one and a half years, ‘not one of the boys above was committed for less than the maximum period allowed by law’. In short, no boy was to leave the School before the age of 16.
His examination of the data revealed that, apart from one 12-year-old boy who was sentenced for a period of one and a half years, ‘not one of the boys above was committed for less than the maximum period allowed by law’. In short, no boy was to leave the School before the age of 16.
He went on to note: Even if crimes such as larceny, truanting and housebreaking, which may well have been motivated by poverty are excluded from the list of offences directly attributable to poverty – it is clear that over 48% of the boys were committed to Glin as a direct consequence of their impoverished backgrounds.
He went on to note: Even if crimes such as larceny, truanting and housebreaking, which may well have been motivated by poverty are excluded from the list of offences directly attributable to poverty – it is clear that over 48% of the boys were committed to Glin as a direct consequence of their impoverished backgrounds.
Mr Dunleavy stated that, between 1947 and 1966, the reasons for admissions were as follows:
Reason for admission | Number |
---|---|
Having a parent not a proper guardian | 218 |
Destitution | 95 |
Larceny | 35 |
Not attending school | 12 |
Housebreaking | 7 |
Wandering | 6 |
Homelessness | 4 |
Parents unable to control child | 3 |
Receiving Alms | 2 |
Parent unable to support child | 2 |
Fraud | 1 |
Being under the care of a parent with criminal habits | 1 |
Total |
386 |
Mr Dunleavy stated that, between 1947 and 1966, the reasons for admissions were as follows:
Reason for admission | Number |
---|---|
Having a parent not a proper guardian | 218 |
Destitution | 95 |
Larceny | 35 |
Not attending school | 12 |
Housebreaking | 7 |
Wandering | 6 |
Homelessness | 4 |
Parents unable to control child | 3 |
Receiving Alms | 2 |
Parent unable to support child | 2 |
Fraud | 1 |
Being under the care of a parent with criminal habits | 1 |
Total |
386 |
The Industrial Schools Act (Ireland), 1868 had envisaged that each school be under the control of a Manager and Management Committee, with the day-to-day running of the school under the supervision of a Resident Manager. In Glin, however, as in all Christian Brothers’ industrial schools, the role of Resident Manager was assumed by the local Superior of the Community. The House Council, consisting of the Superior, Sub-Superior, and one or more Councillors, served as a form of Management Committee.
The Industrial Schools Act (Ireland), 1868 had envisaged that each school be under the control of a Manager and Management Committee, with the day-to-day running of the school under the supervision of a Resident Manager. In Glin, however, as in all Christian Brothers’ industrial schools, the role of Resident Manager was assumed by the local Superior of the Community. The House Council, consisting of the Superior, Sub-Superior, and one or more Councillors, served as a form of Management Committee.